In the midsize-plan market, plan administration and sponsor services and support received their second-highest scores—74% and 76%, respectively. Satisfaction with participant services and investments and fees for this group of plans fell in the middle of scores for all of the plan markets.
Top 5 Providers
by Net Recommendation/Promoter Score*
1
T. Rowe Price
90.00%
2
Charles Schwab
89.40%
3
Empower Retirement
84.80%
4
Voya
80.00%
5
Ascensus
75.00%
*Net Recommendation/Promoter Score is based on Satmetrix Systems' Net Promoter ScoreSM methodology and represents an overall percentage of respondents likely to recommend the provider minus those who are 'neutral' or 'likely to recommend against.
Other providers and their recommendation percentage listed in this market:
Milliman (71.4%); Transamerica (55.6%).
Participant Services
Promoter Satisfaction Rating
# of BICs
1
Charles Schwab
70.10%
5
2
Voya
68.00%
4
3
Empower Retirement
64.70%
4
4
Milliman
64.20%
0
5
T. Rowe Price
61.70%
2
Plan Sponsor Services
Promoter Satisfaction Rating
# of BICs
1
Empower Retirement
89.40%
2
2
Charles Schwab
81.70%
1
3
T. Rowe Price
80.00%
1
4
Ascensus
75.00%
1
4
Milliman
75.00%
1
Plan Admistration
Promoter Satisfaction Rating
# of BICs
1
Milliman
85.40%
3
2
Charles Schwab
83.50%
3
3
T. Rowe Price
76.70%
1
4
Empower Retirement
72.50%
0
5
Ascensus
72.40%
2
Investment & Fees
Promoter Satisfaction Rating
# of BICs
1
Empower Retirement
81.00%
2
2
Charles Schwab
75.30%
2
3
Milliman
71.40%
1
4
Ascensus
67.70%
0
5
Voya
66.70%
1
Best in Class: >$50MM – $200MM Minimum of 10 responses; Best in Class benchmark of 70%
= Best in Class award. = Service Commendation. = Received too few ratings in category and was thus ineligible for recognitions. ◆ = The score was in the top quartile of all comparable scores for that area of service.