ERISA Stock Drop Challenge Targets Allergan
The firm is being challenged in a New Jersey district court for alleged imprudence in the management of its employee stock ownership plan.
The firm is being challenged in a New Jersey district court for alleged imprudence in the management of its employee stock ownership plan.
Plaintiffs had alleged their employer falsely claimed church plan status for its retirement program.
PBGC explains the additional funding and security for the company's defined benefit pension plans is being provided in connection with the sale of Sears' Craftsman brand to Stanley...
The text of the suit offers a detailed look at the investment menu offered to JP Morgan employees, as well as the way fees for the plan have...
Those standing in favor of state-based IRA programs include many retirement plan advisers and other service providers.
A new bill is aimed at implementing a state-based rulemaking process that will require any person who enters into a service contract or agreement with a 403(b) retirement...
The resolution states Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Obama-era DOL related to savings arrangements established by qualified state political subdivisions for non-governmental employees.
Plaintiffs argue that, instead of acting for the exclusive benefit of the plan and its participants and beneficiaries, “defendants acted for the benefit of themselves,” by favoring JP...
The move from DOL this week was not an extension of the applicability date of the fiduciary rule, just a proposal to extend it; there still needs to...
A district court judge in Missouri has denied American Century’s motion for dismissal of a lawsuit accusing the firm of self-dealing within its own 401(k).
If made final, rulemaking proposed today would effectuate a two-month delay in the applicability date of the DOL fiduciary rule.
While a new OMB determination seemingly makes it more burdensome for the Trump administration to unravel the DOL fiduciary rulemaking, there is some disagreement as to what this...
The high court will not offer another review to the long-running case, letting stand a lower court ruling that effectively rejected plaintiffs' arguments that fiduciary breaches had occurred.